BARONETAGE
			Last updated 28/09/2018
			Names of baronets shown in blue
			have not yet proved succession and, as a
			result, their name has not yet been placed on
			the Official Roll of the Baronetage.
Date	Type	Order	Name	Born	Died	Age
			Dates in italics in the "Born" column indicate that the baronet was
			baptised on that date; dates in italics in the "Died" column indicate
			that the baronet was buried on that date
			YARDE-BULLER of Lupton House,Devon
13 Jan 1790	GB	1	Francis Buller	17 Mar 1746	5 Jun 1800	54
5 Jun 1800		2	Francis Buller-Yarde (Buller-Yarde-Buller	28 Sep 1767	17 Apr 1833	65
			from 26 Jun 1800)
			MP for Totnes 1790-1796
17 Apr 1833		3	John Buller Yarde-Buller	12 Apr 1799	4 Sep 1871	72
			He was subsequently created Baron
			Churston (qv) in 1858 with which title
			the baronetcy remains merged
			YARROW of Homestead,Hindhead,Surrey
29 Jan 1916	UK	1	Alfred Fernandez Yarrow	13 Jan 1842	24 Jan 1932	90
24 Jan 1932		2	Harold Edgar Yarrow	11 Aug 1884	19 Apr 1962	77
19 Apr 1962		3	Eric Grant Yarrow	23 Apr 1920	22 Sep 2018	98
22 Sep 2018		4	Ross William Grant Yarrow	14 Jan 1985
			YATE of Buckland,Berks
30 Jul 1622	E	1	Edward Yate		Feb 1645
Feb 1645		2	John Yate		c 1658
c 1658		3	Charles Yate		c 1680
c 1680		4	John Yate		1690
to			Extinct on his death
1690
			YATE of Madeley Hall,Salop
31 Jan 1921	UK	1	Charles Edward Yate	28 Aug 1849	29 Feb 1940	90
to			MP for Melton 1910-1924
29 Feb 1940			Extinct on his death
			YEA of Pyrland,Somerset
18 Jun 1759	GB	1	William Yea		25 Nov 1806
25 Nov 1806		2	William Walter Yea	19 Apr 1784	20 May 1862	78
20 May 1862		3	Henry Lacy Yea	18 Nov 1798	31 Aug 1864	65
to			Extinct on his death
31 Aug 1864
			YEAMANS of Bristol,Gloucs
12 Jan 1665	E	1	John Yeamans		c 1680
c 1680		2	William Yeamans		c 1685
c 1685		3	John Yeamans		c 1690
c 1690		4	John Yeamans	c 1689	c 1730
c 1730		5	John Yeamans	c 1720	c 1780
c 1780		6	Robert Yeamans	c 1742	19 Feb 1788
to			Extinct on his death
19 Feb 1788
			YEAMANS of Redland,Gloucs
31 Dec 1666	E	1	Robert Yeamans		7 Feb 1687
to			Extinct on his death
Feb 1687
			YELVERTON of Rougham,Norfolk
31 May 1620	E	1	William Yelverton	c 1558	30 Oct 1631
30 Oct 1631		2	William Yelverton	c 1590	19 Jul 1648
19 Jul 1648		3	William Yelverton		15 Nov 1649
to			Extinct on his death
15 Nov 1649
			YELVERTON of Easton Mauduit,Northants
30 Jun 1641	E	1	Christopher Yelverton		4 Dec 1654
			MP for Newport 1626 and 1628-1629 and
			Bossiney 1640-1648
4 Dec 1654		2	Henry Yelverton	6 Jul 1633	3 Oct 1670	37
			MP for Northamptonshire 1660 and
			Northampton 1664-1670
3 Oct 1670		3	Charles Yelverton	21 Aug 1657	17 May 1679	21
			He succeeded to the barony of Grey de
			Ruthyn (qv) in 1676 with which title the
			baronetcy then merged until it became
			extinct in 1799
			YONGE of Culliton,Devon
26 Sep 1661	E	1	John Yonge	2 Oct 1603	26 Aug 1663	59
Aug 1663		2	Walter Yonge	c 1625	21 Nov 1670
			MP for Honiton 1659, Lyme Regis 1660 and
			Dartmouth 1667-1670
21 Nov 1670		3	Walter Yonge	8 Sep 1653	18 Jul 1731	77
			MP for Honiton 1679-1681 and 1690-1711
			and Ashburton 1689-1690
18 Jul 1731		4	William Yonge	c 1693	10 Aug 1755
			MP for Honiton 1715-1754 and Tiverton
			1754-1755. Secretary at War 1735-1741
			PC 1735
10 Aug 1755		5	George Yonge	1731	25 Sep 1812	81
to			MP for Honiton 1754-1761 and 1763-1796 and
25 Sep 1812			Old Sarum 1799-1801. Secretary at War 1782-1783
			and 1783-1794. Master of the Mint 1794-1799.
			Governor the Cape of Good Hope 1799-1801.
			PC 1782
			Extinct on his death
			YORKE of Dublin
13 Apr 1761	I	1	William Yorke	c 1700	30 Sep 1776
to			PC [I] 1753
30 Sep 1776			Extinct on his death
			For information on the death of this baronet,
			see the note at the foot of this page
			YOUNG of London
10 Mar 1628	E	1	Richard Young		c Mar 1651
to			MP for Worcester 1621-1622 and 1624-1625
c Mar 1651			Extinct on his death
			YOUNG of North Dean,Bucks
2 May 1769	GB	1	William Young	1725	8 Apr 1788	62
8 Apr 1788		2	William Young	30 Nov 1749	10 Jan 1815	65
			MP for St.Mawes 1784-1806 and
			Buckingham 1806-1807. Governor of
			Tobago 1807-1815
10 Jan 1815		3	William Lawrence Young	c 1778	3 Nov 1824
3 Nov 1824		4	William Lawrence Young	29 Sep 1806	27 Jun 1842	35
			MP for Buckinghamshire 1835-1842
27 Jun 1842		5	William Norris Young	15 Jan 1833	20 Sep 1854	21
			He was killed at the Battle of the Alma during the
			Crimean War
20 Sep 1854		6	George John Young	1 Mar 1835	22 Oct 1854	19
			He died of cholera before Sebastapol during
			the Crimean War
22 Oct 1854		7	Charles Lawrence Young	31 Oct 1839	12 Sep 1887	47
12 Sep 1887		8	William Lawrence Young	3 Aug 1864	11 Jun 1921	56
11 Jun 1921		9	Charles Alban Young	18 Nov 1865	2 Mar 1944	78
2 Mar 1944		10	William Neil Young	22 Jan 1941
			YOUNG of Formosa Place,Berks
24 Nov 1813	UK	1	Samuel Young	23 Feb 1766	14 Dec 1826	60
14 Dec 1826		2	George Young	19 Aug 1797	8 Feb 1848	50
8 Feb 1848		3	George Young	15 Sep 1837	4 Jul 1930	92
4 Jul 1930		4	George Young	25 Oct 1872	26 Sep 1952	79
26 Sep 1952		5	George Peregrine Young	8 Sep 1908	17 Mar 1960	51
17 Mar 1960		6	George Samuel Knatchbull Young,later [2015]	16 Jul 1941
			Baron Young of Cookham [L]
			MP for Acton 1974-1983, Ealing Acton 1983-
			1997 and Hampshire North West 1997-2015.
			Financial Secretary to the Treasury 1994-1995.
			Secretary of State for Transport 1995-1997. Lord
			Privy Seal 2010-2012. Parliamentary Secretary
			to the Treasury (Chief Whip) 2012-2014. PC 1993
			CH 2012
			YOUNG of Bailieborough Castle,co.Cavan
28 Aug 1821	UK	1	William Young		10 Mar 1848
10 Mar 1848		2	John Young,later [1870] Baron Lisgar	31 Aug 1807	6 Oct 1876	69
6 Oct 1876		3	William Muston Need Young	20 Jan 1847	31 Mar 1934	87
31 Mar 1934		4	Cyril Roe Muston Young	21 Aug 1881	15 Jun 1955	73
15 Jun 1955		5	John William Roe Young	28 Jun 1913	5 Apr 1981	67
5 Apr 1981		6	John Kenyon Roe Young	23 Apr 1947
			YOUNG of Partick,Glasgow
7 Sep 1945	UK	1	Arthur Stewart Leslie Young	10 Oct 1889	14 Aug 1950	60
			MP for Partick 1935-1950 and Scotstoun
			1950
14 Aug 1950		2	Alastair Spencer Templeton Young	28 Jun 1918	15 Oct 1963	45
15 Oct 1963		3	Stephen Stewart Templeton Young	24 May 1947
			YOUNGER of Auchen Castle,Dumfries
14 Feb 1911	UK	1	William Younger	28 Jun 1862	28 Jul 1937	75
			MP for Stamford 1895-1906 and Peebles
			and Selkirkshire 1910
28 Jul 1937		2	William Robert Younger	27 Oct 1888	25 May 1973	84
25 May 1973		3	John William Younger	18 Nov 1920	14 May 2002	81
14 May 2002		4	Julian William Richard Younger	10 Feb 1950
			YOUNGER of Leckie,Clackmannan
12 Jul 1911	UK	1	George Younger	13 Oct 1851	29 Apr 1929	77
			He was subsequently created Viscount
			Younger of Leckie (qv) in 1923 with which
			title the baronetcy remains merged
			YOUNGER of Fountain Bridge,Edinburgh
17 Feb 1964	UK	1	William McEwan Younger	6 Sep 1905	15 Apr 1992	86
to			Extinct on his death
15 Apr 1992
			YULE of Hugli River,Calcutta,India
30 Jan 1922	UK	1	Sir David Yule	4 Aug 1858	3 Jul 1928	69
to			For further information on this baronet, see the
3 Jul 1928			note at the foot of this page
			Extinct on his death
			Sir William Yorke, 1st and only baronet
			'The London Chronicle' of 5 October 1776:-
			'The death of Sir William Yorke, late Lord Chief Justice of Ireland, was owing to a mistake of his
			servant. Sir William was grievously afflicted with the stone, and in a very severe fit he used to
			take a certain quantity of drops of laudanum. On Monday evening last he called for his usual
			remedy, during the most racking pains of his distemper; the drops could not be found. The
			servant was dispatched to his apothecary at Brentford, but instead of laudanum drops he asked
			for laudanum; a quantity was sent, with special charge not to give Sir William more than 24
			drops. The fellow forgetting the caution, gave the bottle into his master's hand, who in his
			agony drank up the whole contents of the bottle, and expired in less than an hour after.'
			Sir David Yule, 1st and only baronet
			In legal proceedings after his death, Yule was described as "the wealthiest man in India and
			probably in the British Empire." Because of his wealth, his estate was extremely large, and
			therefore extremely attractive to the revenue authorities, which sought to claim the duty on
			the estate. In this they were opposed by his widow. The question turned on where Sir David's
			place of domicile was found to be - India, England or Scotland, where he was born.
			The case was heard by Mr. Justice Rowlatt in November 1930. The following, edited, report
			appeared in "The Times" on 14 November 1930:-
			'His Lordship gave judgment for the Crown on the claim to duty on the estate of the late Sir
			David Yule, Bt., who died on Jul 3, 1928. The question involved was whether Sir David Yule had
			acquired a domicile in India and, if so, whether he had abandoned it and acquired a domicile of
			choice in England or had revived his Scottish domicile of origin.
			'Mr. Justice Rowlatt, in giving judgment, said that the case was one in which he had heard, and
			properly heard, a great deal of detailed evidence, but the result could be put under broad
			heads. The case was one in which it was necessary to be careful lest one "failed to see the
			wood for the trees."
			'In one or two respects, but only in one or two, the case was unique. The great success of Sir
			David Yule, the enormous fortune which he had made, might have been unique, as might his
			character in its strength and ability. The other respect in which the case was unique was the
			degree to which Sir David Yule managed to penetrate the division which normally kept Euro-
			peans in India from close domestic and social intimacy with Indian families. In other respects
			the story was one of a very successful Anglo-Indian merchant of British blood making his
			fortune in India, which was not very different from other lives of the same sort.
			'The Crown started with the Scottish domicile of origin, and the question was whether it had
			been proved by the respondents that the testator exchanged it for a domicile in India. The
			onus of proving that was a very considerable one and had to be discharged with clearness.
			'One approached a case of that kind keeping clearly in view that it was one of an Englishman
			said to have obtained a domicile in a hot Oriental country. There was no reason in law why he
			should not do so, but it was less usual in fact than the acquisition of a new domicile in a
			temperate climate such as Canada.
			'Domicile was a difficult conception, but the question might roughly be put in the form: "Did
			this man become a settler in the country, or was he only a sojourner there?" The case fell to be
			considered with regard to one or two periods. The respondents contended that he had acquired
			an Indian domicile by 1900, when he came home and got married, and that he could not be said
			subsequently to have abandoned it; or, it was said that the whole period up to his death
			supported the contention of Indian domicile. But whatever period was taken, it was necessary
			to look at acts done afterwards as evidence of the intention of acts done before that period.
			So if one looked to 1900 as the material date, one could not shut out acts done afterwards.
			'Sir David Yule had two uncles who were prosperous Indian merchants, and it was under their
			auspices, and especially under the auspices of Mr. George Yule, that he went out to Calcutta
			at the age of 17. Mr. George Yule threw himself very much into Indian life and had great
			sympathy with Indian aims, and probably impressed upon his young nephew the importance of
			not holding himself aloof but of getting to know not only those with whom he must do business,
			but the people of the country. He was very properly imbued with those views, and he did
			succeed in putting himself on level terms with the Indians.
			'He (his Lordship) had a little difficulty in seeing how far that bore on the question of domicile.
			Did it amount to more than that he had made very close friends in the country? The allegation
			that he did not affect European society was hardly borne out, for Lady Yule had stated that
			when she went out after her marriage, though they did not entertain much, Europeans
			occasionally dined with them. It did not appear that he was averse from Europeans; he simply
			was not a social man. It was not suggested in any way that he departed from the habits of an
			Englishman, which were valued rather highly, and became Orientalized in outlook or habits. No
			doubt, whether in his house at Garden Reach [a suburb of Calcutta], or in his flat over the
			offices in Clive-row, he lived the life of an ordinary Englishman.
			'He stuck to business with enormous tenacity, and did not take a holiday, except once in 25
			years - that was what it amounted to. When he did come home in 1900 his prospects were all
			in India and, if India had been wiped out, there would have been very little left for him. That
			was all very true: he had then not much interest outside India. But had he become a settler
			there? One must look at what followed. Did he put aside the idea of marrying his cousin and
			what it might lead to? Was it likely that at 42 he would come to the clear decision of being a
			Calcutta man and nothing else? He (his Lordship) could not have come to that conclusion even
			if the testator had died in 1900.
			'But, in fact, he married, and the sticking close to his desk in Calcutta came to an end. He was
			still the unexampled worker, the untiring man of business, but from that time more at home than
			in India.
			'When the case was opened he (his Lordship) was not sure whether there was not going to be
			some colour of this sort: that Mrs. Yule, as she then was, having gone to India, found it very
			dull and came home without even trying; and that he, being wrapped up in his business and
			finding that his wife would not share his life, had more or less cast her off.
			'Neither of those ideas seemed to him to be in the least true. His wife came home because she
			was desperately ill, and it was quite impossible for her to stay in India. On the other hand, it
			would be most unjust to Sir David Yule's memory to suggest that because of his business in
			India he in any way ignored his wife and daughter. His duties as husband and father were
			perfectly properly kept up. All those 25 years he had a house in England and an office in
			London, and nearly always a fishing in Scotland. In Calcutta he had, of course, also a flat over
			his office.
			'From the moment of his arrival home in 1902 he was a director of the Mercantile Bank of India.
			It was because he was an Indian magnate that he was asked to join the board, but the fact
			remained that he had a big London business life, and it was difficult to see how, in the latter
			part of his life, it could be argued that he was not more predominantly English than Indian.
			'Of more importance than the fact that the testator struck out his address at Hanstead House
			from his draft will was the fact that he was de facto in possession of Hanstead House and was
			rated and registered as a voter in respect of it. The declaration of domicile in the will was of
			more importance, but he doubted whether Sir David Yule understood what domicile meant. The
			fortunate ones who did so were few. He only meant that his centre of gravity, as it were, was
			in India. All his life he had looked with great interest and affection on India, regarding himself,
			perhaps, as a creature of India, but circumstances were too strong for him. He had a wife and
			daughter in England, and came to visit them whenever he could, and he had business interests
			in England. Whatever dreams he might have had of ultimately acquiring a house in Calcutta and
			persuading his wife and daughter to go and live there could not outweigh the actual facts.
			'The onus on the respondents had not been discharged, and he must declare that Sir David
			Yule died domiciled in the United Kingdom, because he had never lost his domicile of origin. That
			amounted to judgment for the Crown.....'
			Lady Yule appealed this decision, but her appeal was dismissed in March 1931.
			Copyright © 2020 Maltagenealogy.com